Calling Rover V8 experts. - Reply to Topic
Have an account? Register

Forgot your password?

Forgot your username?


Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: Calling Rover V8 experts.

Your Message


Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces)

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Register Now

Please enter the name by which you would like to log-in and be known on this site.

Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Where you live, Town\City\County etc.

Please enter your full name
This field cannot be edited once it has been completed other than via contacting the site admin. Please make sure the information is correct first time.


Additional Options

  • Will turn into [URL][/URL].

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 13-12-2009, 15:42
    62 and 302
    I used a matched Edelbrock manifold and carb; thy've been really good
  • 13-12-2009, 13:28
    Thanks for the info guys ,I assumed in my ignorance that the lower profile manifolds were about the same. I'm thinking that the holley would be best for me as I'm used to them and injection might give me problems I can't fix myself. Looks like a 390 on top of a dual plane manifold for the lower RPM range would do me for now and if it can do 25 MPG that will be a bonus

  • 13-12-2009, 11:55
    i used the webber carb set up on my last rv8, brand new 4 barrel, with edelbrock manifold was superb, fired straight up out the box, minimal tweaking to get the mixture spot on and never faultered

    injection as said above is simple to set up and looks good i reck, for an everyday user probably the cheapest and best way to go
  • 13-12-2009, 10:13
    If you want an injecton set up a mate has a complete one for sale for 70 ,no idea what it came from but could get pictures if it matters.
  • 13-12-2009, 04:04
    injection, its easy to wire only 4 wires once the loom has been seperated, better performance on a stock engine, the only extra thing you would need is a return line to the tank,
  • 12-12-2009, 17:15
    farncombe pop
    Should make it clear that Kev is saying stay clear of the offy 360 as the jwr duel plane was still an offy but much better,
  • 12-12-2009, 16:39
    The Offy is a 3000 rpm upwards manifold, low end flow is poor, the other 2 feature split inlet runners meaning better air fuel velocity / atomisation .This leads tobetter bottom end pick up and economy.

    The Offy gained popularity because it was once the only manifold you could buy and are fairly readily available secondhand. The other 2 will pay for themselves with the performance gain and better fuel return.
  • 12-12-2009, 14:49
    Quote Originally Posted by kapri View Post
    not an expert but i've always gone with 390 holley on a decent dual plane manifold ( like edelbrock performer or jwr ) not offy . With the right gearing ( 22 mph /1000 rpm ) i used to see 30 on a run on a 3.5 with hurricane cam , headers ,and mild port job.
    just curious kev why not the offy in your opinion
  • 12-12-2009, 13:42
    Not an expert but I've always gone with 390 Holley on a decent dual plane manifold ( like Edelbrock Performer or JWR ) NOT Offy . With the right gearing ( 22 mph /1000 rpm ) I used to see 30 on a run on a 3.5 with Hurricane cam , headers ,and mild port job.
  • 12-12-2009, 11:53
    Ask v8ian......
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts