Joined
·
568 Posts
I agree :tup::smoke:Nailed it Roberto, reckon it actually looks better with the screen than it did without, really like it from this angle.
View attachment 296621
I agree :tup::smoke:Nailed it Roberto, reckon it actually looks better with the screen than it did without, really like it from this angle.
View attachment 296621
don't get me , or myself , or my inner me , or ,that bit that's there but i don't know about ...or any of the other 28 people at the committee table of my mind ......started !......"Video 1 , where i try different afr's and watch the ego vary , and also experiment with the ego pid settings..."
Hi Robert
It's a bu**er when your Ego messes with your Id....that way lies paranoia or madness!:shake:
The D (derivative) gain is effectively a damping factor that applies when your input signal is changing quickly (it has no effect when the input is constant). You would increase D to remove overshoot. P and I are summed together so you would nearly always have to adjust both at once. You'd expect I to be much smaller that P in most cases.changing to 100 events per change , and changing the pid settings , which were actually at 15.5.15....seems to have had a dramatic effect ,and completely stopped the reverse correction i was getting ..now to try it on the car, i predict a bit of a pid loop surge fest with that much P... but i can play with it .
Well with 28 people you will always have a quorum for a meeting at a moments notice :tup:don't get me , or myself , or my inner me , or ,that bit that's there but i don't know about ...or any of the other 28 people at the committee table of my mind ......started !